Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Zanubrutinib is a next-generation, selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). We compared zanubrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab to determine its effectiveness as frontline therapy in patients with CLL or SLL. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 study at 153 academic or community hospitals in 14 countries and regions. Eligible patients had untreated CLL or SLL requiring treatment as per International Workshop on CLL criteria; were aged 65 years or older, or 18 years or older and had comorbidities; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. A central interactive web response system randomly assigned patients without del(17)(p13·1) to zanubrutinib (group A) or bendamustine-rituximab (group B) by sequential block method (permutated blocks with a random block size of four). Patients with del(17)(p13·1) were enrolled in group C and received zanubrutinib. Zanubrutinib was administered orally at 160 mg twice per day (28-day cycles); bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 of body surface area on days 1 and 2 for six cycles plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 of body surface area the day before or on day 1 of cycle 1, and 500 mg/m2 of body surface area on day 1 of cycles 2-6, were administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival per independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population in groups A and B, with minimum two-sided α of 0·05 for superiority. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03336333, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Oct 31, 2017, and July 22, 2019, 590 patients were enrolled; patients without del(17)(p13·1) were randomly assigned to zanubrutinib (group A; n=241) or bendamustine-rituximab (group B; n=238). At median follow-up of 26·2 months (IQR 23·7-29·6), median progression-free survival per independent review committee was not reached in either group (group A 95% CI not estimable [NE] to NE; group B 28·1 months to NE). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in group A versus group B (HR 0·42 [95% CI 0·28 to 0·63]; two-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was neutropenia (27 [11%] of 240 patients in group A, 116 [51%] of 227 in group B, and 17 [15%] of 111 patients in group C). Serious adverse events occurred in 88 (37%) of 240 patients in group A, 113 (50%) of 227 patients in group B, and 45 (41%) of 111 patients in group C. Adverse events leading to death occurred in 11 (5%) of 240 patients in group A, 12 (5%) of 227 patients in group B, and three (3%) of 111 patients in group C, most commonly due to COVID-19 (four [2%] of 240 patients in group A), diarrhoea, and aspiration pneumonia (two each [1%] of 227 patients in group B). INTERPRETATION: Zanubrutinib significantly improved progression-free survival versus bendamustine-rituximab, with an acceptable safety profile consistent with previous studies. These data support zanubrutinib as a potential new treatment option for untreated CLL and SLL. FUNDING: BeiGene.

Efficacy and Safety at 48 Weeks of Pegcetacoplan in Adult Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Patients with Suboptimal Response to Prior Eculizumab Treatment

Context: Pegcetacoplan (PEG) is a C3 complement inhibitor recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). PEG was superior to eculizumab (ECU;C5-inhibitor) in improving hemoglobin levels at week 16 during the phase 3 PEGASUS trial (NCT03500549) in patients with suboptimal response to prior ECU treatment. Objective: We report on efficacy and safety of PEG and results from a post hoc time-aligned analysis based on start of PEG dosing. Design: Eighty PNH patients (≥18 years, hemoglobin levels <10.5 g/dL despite stable ECU treatment [≥3 months]) were enrolled. Following a 4-week run-in, patients were randomized (1:1) to PEG or ECU monotherapy for the randomized controlled period (RCP) through week 16, before initiating an open-label period (OLP) through week 48, where ECU patients completed a second run-in before switching to PEG monotherapy (ECU-to-PEG), and PEG patients continued PEG monotherapy (PEG-to-PEG). Key endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in hemoglobin levels and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Timepoints were manually aligned based on start of PEG dosing (PEG-to-PEG: day 1;ECU-to-PEG: week 20) to compare changes in hemoglobin levels between groups. Results: PEG-to-PEG patients achieved sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 16 through the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.3 g/dL;CFB: 2.5 g/dL). ECU-to-PEG patients displayed improved hemoglobin levels during the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.6 g/dL;CFB: 2.9 g/dL). Timepoint alignment demonstrated no significant difference (p=0.64) between improvements in hemoglobin levels at 28 and 48 weeks among PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups, respectively. Thirty percent of patients reported a serious AE, 6% possibly PEG-related. Common AEs for PEG-treated patients were injection site reactions (36%), hemolysis (24%), and diarrhea (21%). Twelve patients (15%) discontinued PEG due to AEs: 3 in RCP, 8 in OLP, 1 during follow-up, including one death due to COVID-19, unrelated to PEG. Conclusions: PEG-treated patients experienced sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 48, and the safety profile of PEG was consistent with previously reported data. The treatment effect of PEG on hemoglobin levels over time was similar between PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups. Thus, PEG represents a new effective therapeutic option for PNH patients.

How We Manage Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These can be exacerbated by anti-leukemic treatments. In addition, the typical patients with CLL already have fragilities and background risk factors that apply to the general population for severe COVID-19. On these bases, patients with CLL may experience COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Recurrent seasonal epidemics of SARS-CoV-2 are expected, and doctors taking care of patients with CLL must be prepared for the possibility of substantial resurgences of infection and adapt their approach to CLL management accordingly. In this Guideline Article, we aim at providing clinicians with a literature-informed expert opinion on the management of patients with CLL during SARS-CoV-2 epidemic.